lotesse: (bsg_war)
I've been making The Boy watch through Classic Battlestar Galactica on Hulu with me, and falling in love with the show all over again. I had a thing for it back in high school; somehow it totally feel through the cracks in my fanbrain until now. I've got tiny little hearts love for it. Love that is full of sighs and nerdery. Seriously passionate love.

Apparently, I've got surprising amounts of things to say about this show. Who knew? )

Jan. 30th, 2010 04:07 pm
lotesse: (Holmes/Watson)
Ugh. I somehow - don't ask me how - ended up in the Sherlock Holmes section of ff.n, where I found a disturbing quantity of fic marked "bromance." I've never seen that term applied to fanwork before; I earnestly hope to never do so again. Bromance!
lotesse: (darkisrising)
I love Solstice. Maybe it's a function of a Northern Michigan childhood, I don't know - but somehow I always feel, Solstice morning, as if a tremendous weight has been lifted from me, as if I am free, as if I can fly.

And this year it coincides with my post-yuletide-uploading happy, so I'm all smiley. Seriously, you guys, do you all have any idea how wonderful you are? Today I'm amazed by fannish power and ingenuity: not only did we write all those bloody Yuletide stories - not to mention recording all of the podbangs! - but we built the sites that hold them. This year, Yuletide is on our own servers. And I'm just overwhelmed by how cool this entire enterprise is. Not only are the sisters doing it for themselves, they're also ridiculously smart, innovative, and artistic.
lotesse: (winter)
Oh my god. Whoever just gave me six months' paid accountage - I just opened my recent comments page, and my eyes got really, really big when I could suddenly see more than ten. Um. I feel all verklempt. This is pretty much the most awesome thing anyone has ever done for me, and, uh. I'm so grateful to you, whoever you are. And really happy. If you tell me who you are, I will totally make you fic or icons or wallpapers or banners or mixes or any other thing you want, because you are definitely my new favorite person in the world.
lotesse: (btvs_sapphic)
Hay guise? I've got spare Dreamwidth codes for anybody who wants to come over to the sane/nondiscriminatory place.
lotesse: (hagaren_classification)
"the blonde"? Is a girl. I can tell, because you spelled that descriptor in the feminine way. Words that are also not ungendered: fiance/fiancee, confidant/confidante. Get the picture? I keep feeling like I've accidentally wandered into Elric genderswap fic - not that there's anything wrong with that.
lotesse: (literature - Victorian)
It's been like fandom party central these last couple of days, between the AO3 opening and Yuletide and the shiny new Merlin ep and just wow. I heart this thing of ours so hard. It makes me so happy that between the AO3 and Dreamwidth and Fanlore we're really coming to be in possession of our own arts, and my inner cultural historian is also really thrilled that we've begun constructing our edifice, making our mark a little more indelible.

Erroneously gendered contemporaneous reviews of George Eliot just make it all the better. Sporfle.

wheee!

Nov. 13th, 2009 12:44 pm
lotesse: (porn?)
Ho wow! I has an AO3 account!
lotesse: (feminism - Buffy)
Two things that got me out of my black mood -

1. Patricia Hill Collins. I think the mess yesterday hit me harder than usual because I'd just been really grappling for the first time with Foucault and postmodern despair. I'd just come out of a classroom session that was very heavy on the nothing is possible, everything is coopted end of deconstructionism, and everything that was happening seemed to me to be only demonstrating the proof of that. Depressing. But - god, I don't know where I'd be without the power of Black feminism. Hill Collins has an absolutely gorgeous critique of the postmodern edifice - one of those readings which in retrospect seems so clear, so obvious - in her book "Fighting Words." The relevant chapter is "What's Going On? Black Feminist Thought and the Politics of Postmodernism," and the whole thing is almost available on GoogleBooks here. It's worth a read - I really wish someone had handed it to me before the four hundred pages of Foucault.

2. This morning, for totally unfun class-related reasons, I found myself on the front page of the Project Muse journal database. And I saw this image:



looking up at me from the new arrivals section. I'd heard that the issue existed, and I'd actually read some of the articles all ready, but I hadn't heard about the cover. To see that lovely still - a still from a fanvid! - representing me, us, in all our nerdy and bespectacled glory, made me absolutely gasp. Congrats to everyone who printed in the issue - I'm going to hunt it down this afternoon in the Uni library, because I really want to hold a hard copy in my hands of this - an academic journal, in a University library, with a still from a fanvid on the front cover. Just. wow.

Wheee!

Sep. 15th, 2009 12:54 pm
lotesse: (daddyissues!Luke)
Fwrrrr! New TWC issue! Yay yay yay! (Congrats, everybody with published articles, y'all rock hard)
lotesse: (fairytale - snow white)
Oh for heaven's sake. Other people daring to care about their own oppressions - or, shocker, having compassion for someone else's - is not harshing anybody's squee. Or, I'm sorry, did I miss the part where people of color/genderqueers/younameit aren't parts of this community?

The only way for fandom to have a higher proportion of squee to fail, which I agree would be nice and shiny, is for people to stop failing so damn much!
lotesse: (feminism - Buffy)
Okay, so apparently [livejournal.com profile] deadlychameleon established here that Ogas and Gaddam do not have either IRB approval or the support of Boston University. Which removes them from the academic sphere.

So here's my question: tactically speaking, what do we do now? I mean obviously we flame them and spam them and people are starting to write some kinda awesome RPS and that's all happymaking, but can we do something to kill their book deal? If this had been an academic matter, the protocols on that would have been clear. Who do we need to be emailing at Dutton? Can we put a stop to this, or do we have to settle for just doing as much damage as possible?

*twitch*

Aug. 8th, 2009 07:57 pm
lotesse: (meta)
... my hometown newspaper just got linked to in [community profile] as_others_see_us. V. peculiar.
lotesse: (porn?)
I keep feeling like I'm not the fan everybody's looking for, at least wrt the warnings debate. Because while I'm fortunate enough to not have any real-life triggers, I also prefer my fic plastered with warnings and spoilers of every sort.

I do this with all narrative, actually, because I don't like suspense, and I find the first reading/viewing/hearing of a piece to be the least interesting. I connect much harder to characters once I know where they're going - and often I love sequences in hindsight that bored me the first time around, because I've since fallen in love with the people in them.

I also have fairly ironclad characterizations and interpretive patterns - so what [personal profile] ratcreature's been talking about with the deeper issues relating to the Blair Sandburg haircut warnings definitely applies to me. I often have a very inflexible vision of canon - I'll read exceptionally good fic that falls outside it, but I'll put up with a lot more mediocrity when my preferred tropes are active. So my Daniel Jackson needs to be a gentle civilian geekboy, and my Jim Kirk is really damn smart and personally withdrawing, and my Frodo Baggins is unquestionably an adult as opposed to a teenager, and my Faith Lehane is something more than an evil bitch, and my Edward Elric is weird about his little brother.

Most fics that deviate from those characterizations get closed out of - they have to be really, really good for me to keep reading. And I like it when it's fairly obvious from the outset what character facets particular writers subscribe to, because I hate it when I read far enough in to get invested in the plot before I find out that an author's characterizations are just too different from my own for her story to work for me. And when warnings, descriptors, summaries, and author's notes give me such information right upfront, well, the happier I am.

I realized, in talking with my beta about my (almost finished I swear!) big postquest LotR fic, that the direction of the ending is not actually obvious in the narrative climax. And I thought about trying to hide the outcome, to keep any eventual readers in suspense. But then I realized that I would absolutely hate it if such a thing were done to me - particularly, in this case, because the question at hand involves the Grey Havens, which are traumatic enough that I need to have fair warning going in if they're going to happen as read. If I read through a whole novella thinking that there was hope only to have it snatched away from me - or vice versa - I remember, about two years ago, reading Middlemarch for the first time having only previously done Eliot's depressing stuff. I was sure until the end that everybody was going to die horribly, and I was shocked when they didn't. And I was less involved in Dorothea/Will than I might have been otherwise, because I was bracing myself all the time for a blow that never fell.

At any rate. As a rule, I don't click through to stories that don't have posted summaries, warnings, and indicators as to length. I want specific data before I commit! Am I really that unusual?

eta: just to make clear, I'm not making a political argument, or one of social responsibility, though I think those are important. I'm arguing from the practical - if your story doesn't have information tags all over it, why would I click that link? I'm arguing that information tags are good for fanwriters and fanreaders, as advertisements.
lotesse: (stargate - a singer must die)
Mmmrph. Brain falling out of ears.

I'm editing/proofing a Master's thesis for a friend of a friend on foster care and family systems, and man. A hundred and fifty-odd pages of (sigh) not very dynamic writing. Blarph.

But! It is making me want to go off and read foster care fic! So here are some recs:

Oye Como Va by Micah. The Sentinel. Not straight foster care, but a great look at Blair Sandburg's itinerant childhood and the connections he formed in that time. Fabulously atmospheric, prettily emo.

Nilchance's shelter-verse. Supernatural. Winchesters and foster care: not an easy combination.

little rattle stilt by [personal profile] hope.Supernatural. "He’s not afraid. He’s angry. Dad always told him it was better to be angry than afraid. Dad told him he only had to be afraid of the things Dad couldn’t kill, and Dean laughed and said that was nothing."

Moon by [personal profile] kalimyre. SG-1. Daniel has psychic whammy, Jack has to watch his dreams, less than pleasant bits of Daniel's history with the foster care system are revealed.

Legacy by Anglachel. Lord of the Rings. A fascinating look at Frodo's relationship to his blood family, his lost parents' memories, and Bilbo.

oh, and speaking of, does anyone know where Willow-wode's Rites of Passage has scarpered off to?

(this is what I love about fandom. Work boring? Solution is obviously fictional hunters, archaeologists, Guides, and hobbits. We are so collectively odd.)
lotesse: (fullmetal - heartbroken)
Oof. Okay, that hiatus was unexpected sry. The psychology of moving is so weird - I've been being isolative because I've been just waiting down the days, but considering that I still have two weeks to go that may not have been the best idea.

I have, however, been consuming huge amounts of media. Last week we watched through all of Fullmetal Alchemist again, and made a move toward picking up Brotherhood - the new series being animated in Japan at the moment. Not sure if we'll watch it regularly, because I attach hard to voice acting and we watch FMA dubbed. (My personal rule for dub/sub has to do with the nature of the culture being portrayed, so Anglophiliac stuff like Howl or FMA is watched dubbed. I mean, Japanese doesn't really have the phonology to pronounce the main characters' names!)

Fic rec: In Living Memory, by [livejournal.com profile] cryogenia. Elrics-centric prison!fic AU. The good stuff.

Regarding DreamWidth - I expect to get a code on the 30th, and I do think that I'll eventually move over there. I'm not really worried about subscribe/access, because I very rarely flock and I don't use filters, and when I do flock it just tends to be for emo stuff or employment info that isn't 100% yet. When I do move, I will be redirecting comments - but since I don't flock, it should take the exact same number of clicks to comment there as it would to comment here. DW says that they'll have it worked out so that I can integrate flists, so I'm not dropping anybody either.

But I am moving, because I believe in DreamWidth. And I guess because I feel like it's time. But also because of what [livejournal.com profile] afterthree says here about monetization. I am sick of being their user-generated content. I don't like it when people try to sell me, instead of selling to me.

miscellany

Mar. 31st, 2009 09:24 pm
lotesse: (Default)
First, a rec: The House of Your Heart is Lit From Within, a gorgeous Prydain NYR fic that [livejournal.com profile] thistlerose unknowingly wrote for one of my Boy's yuletide prompts.

Second, I just have to register my nebulous and yet ongoing squee over DreamWidth. This is going to be sooo cool homg. (and oh my god do I ever want one of those codes!)

Third, a poem in honor of the cruellest month, in hopes that it will not be so for me:

Song Of A Second April
Edna St. Vincent Millay

April this year, not otherwise
Than April of a year ago,
Is full of whispers, full of sighs,
Of dazzling mud and dingy snow;
Hepaticas that pleased you so
Are here again, and butterflies.

There rings a hammering all day,
And shingles lie about the doors;
In orchards near and far away
The grey wood-pecker taps and bores;
The men are merry at their chores,
And children earnest at their play.

The larger streams run still and deep,
Noisy and swift the small brooks run
Among the mullein stalks the sheep
Go up the hillside in the sun,
Pensively,—only you are gone,
You that alone I cared to keep.
lotesse: (feminism - Buffy)
Man, Sh*tt*rly's continued framing of the issue as a flamewar has made me realize just how necessary the term "imbroglio" actually is - he sounds so amazingly dismissive, as if racial oppression and malicious outing are on a par with shipwars or the Cult of Mean. At a certain point, which I think we've reached, it isn't even valid to call him a wanker. He's crossed over into downright choadery. Nothing anyone on the antiracist side of the imbroglio was in any way wanky - we were producing analysis, not bearing grudges, being bitches, or rushing to judgment. Ugh.

For the record, my list of never-more-shall-be-read now contains Sh*tt*rly, Cramer, Bear, Bull, and the Neilsen Haydens. Monette I remain drawn on. As far as new reads, I hear that [livejournal.com profile] jonquil is putting together all the POC recs from [livejournal.com profile] coffeeandink's post, which will be an amazing resource.

Profile

lotesse: (Default)
throbbing light machine

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Page generated Jul. 3rd, 2025 06:50 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios