lotesse: (feminism - Buffy)
[personal profile] lotesse
Man, Sh*tt*rly's continued framing of the issue as a flamewar has made me realize just how necessary the term "imbroglio" actually is - he sounds so amazingly dismissive, as if racial oppression and malicious outing are on a par with shipwars or the Cult of Mean. At a certain point, which I think we've reached, it isn't even valid to call him a wanker. He's crossed over into downright choadery. Nothing anyone on the antiracist side of the imbroglio was in any way wanky - we were producing analysis, not bearing grudges, being bitches, or rushing to judgment. Ugh.

For the record, my list of never-more-shall-be-read now contains Sh*tt*rly, Cramer, Bear, Bull, and the Neilsen Haydens. Monette I remain drawn on. As far as new reads, I hear that [livejournal.com profile] jonquil is putting together all the POC recs from [livejournal.com profile] coffeeandink's post, which will be an amazing resource.

Date: 2009-03-04 04:39 pm (UTC)
ext_6866: (Default)
From: [identity profile] sistermagpie.livejournal.com
Yes, the dismissiveness has been constant and I don't know why they think it makes them come across well. I get it as a defense mechanism, but it doesn't do them any favors.

Date: 2009-03-04 05:27 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jane-dark.livejournal.com
I don't think I have words for how mindbogglingly cluelessly various people who ought to know better have acted. And it just keeps going, and going, and gahhhh.

Profile

lotesse: (Default)
throbbing light machine

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Page generated Jan. 24th, 2026 08:54 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios