![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I'm finally reading Elaine Scarry's "On Beauty and Being Just," - one of the ones I've been pretending to have read for years - and, idek, guys, I kind of hate it. Like, the prose is gorgeous, of course, hers always is, but I feel like she's strawmanning all over the place. I'll agree that extrapolating from feminist critiques of beauty to argue that, say, a vase is negatively reified when looked at is silly as anything. But similarly, I feel like extrapolating from a vase or a flower to human aesthetics is just as wrongheaded, and that's what she keeps doing. The feminist critique doesn't object to beauty qua beauty, it objects to the weaponization of beauty in the service of racism, classism, and misogyny. So I just. Don't know what to do with this book. And am frustrated.
some linkspamming:
oursin, 'Adequate' and 'competent' are not, in fact, pejoratives - this conversation was something I really needed to read. When I was in fifth grade, my parents convinced me that even top marks were meaningless, because all my As meant was that I was doing better than the other kids, not that I was working at my own maximum potential. So I just possibly have some issues.
Abigail Nussbaum reviews the Avengers - everything she said, please.
new Regina Spektor Album with streaming option!
eta: Garland Grey, Buffy Vs. The Beige Demon: Good Riddance to Riley Finn: Most modern television shows display their enlightenment by unleashing paper sexists at their heroine and allowing us to take the clobbering of these shadows as a triumph over sexism. Which, in the unscripted world, is too often not a douchebag saying “You can’t cuz you’re a girl” but is instead someone internalizing that belief and using their power to punish you for it. This scenario creates a false image in the culture of “What Sexism Looks Like” which men use to calibrate their understanding of misogyny. Which means anything less blatant than THAT is just the moaning of people who can’t compete AND once the show has labeled itself NOT SEXIST, it is free to deal in subtler, more insidious forms of sexism. Also with lovely Classic Trek exempla.
some linkspamming:
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Abigail Nussbaum reviews the Avengers - everything she said, please.
new Regina Spektor Album with streaming option!
eta: Garland Grey, Buffy Vs. The Beige Demon: Good Riddance to Riley Finn: Most modern television shows display their enlightenment by unleashing paper sexists at their heroine and allowing us to take the clobbering of these shadows as a triumph over sexism. Which, in the unscripted world, is too often not a douchebag saying “You can’t cuz you’re a girl” but is instead someone internalizing that belief and using their power to punish you for it. This scenario creates a false image in the culture of “What Sexism Looks Like” which men use to calibrate their understanding of misogyny. Which means anything less blatant than THAT is just the moaning of people who can’t compete AND once the show has labeled itself NOT SEXIST, it is free to deal in subtler, more insidious forms of sexism. Also with lovely Classic Trek exempla.
no subject
Date: 2012-05-23 12:38 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-05-24 03:04 am (UTC)Applied to anyone else? I would never encourage setting your kid up to be this highstrung. But I also don't know if I'd be willing to risk what I might've lost if they hadn't pushed me so incredibly hard.
no subject
Date: 2012-05-23 12:41 am (UTC)And now I'm going off to read that, too, because my parents did the same. If I wasn't at the top of my class, I was an utter piece of shite, but even being at the top - even an 100% score - wasn't enough.
no subject
Date: 2012-05-24 03:07 am (UTC)But they didn't always know how, and I wonder what answers I might have come to if they'd allowed me to just be the weird kid for a few years, instead of treating me like a ~project~.