lotesse: (porn)
[personal profile] lotesse
Why, when discussing eighteenth-nineteenth(twentieth-)century anti-novel rhetoric, does no one address the discursive parallels with injunctions against onanism/masturbation? (and does anyone know of a book that does? because I would totally read that book.)

Date: 2011-02-28 03:10 am (UTC)
ineptshieldmaid: Language is my playground (Default)
From: [personal profile] ineptshieldmaid
olitary sex as a serious moral issue can be dated with a precision rare in cultural history; Laqueur identifies it with the publication of the anonymous tract Onania in about 1722

As a medievalist I dispute this assertion!

Date: 2011-02-28 03:33 am (UTC)
ithiliana: (Default)
From: [personal profile] ithiliana
As someone who lives with a medieval historian, I know that a whole slew of people in academia tend to think that everything starts in the "early modern period" and know sod all about the Middle Ages. I don't know Laqueur's training, but I do know the book has had a lot of critical criticism (I keep telling myself I should read it, I just never get around to it--am much more drawn by the other book I mentioned above)

Date: 2011-02-28 10:20 am (UTC)
oursin: My photograph of Praire Buoy sculpture, Meadowbrook Park, Urbana, overwritten with Urgent, Phallic Look (urgent phallic)
From: [personal profile] oursin
That is certainly a very weird blurb, since what happens with Onania-mania is that what used to be a sin becomes a medically-dangerous practice. It also gets a different publication date for The Big O than the book itself, which places it about a decade earlier as I recall!

Profile

lotesse: (Default)
throbbing light machine

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Page generated Jan. 28th, 2026 03:52 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios