lotesse: (Queen Anne's Lace)
[personal profile] lotesse
I feel like I ought to talk about Saddam, but I have nothing to say. The f. is in the h. I am valiantly facepalming. And I don't know enough to be able to talk about the political ramifications, that's not why I have a problem with the whole thing. I oppose the death penalty; end of story

For something completely different,

A meme.

In 2007, lotesseflower resolves to...
Overcome my secret fear of pirates.
Pay for my essays on time.
Spend less time on greek.
Eat more books.
Give up winchesters.
Go writing three times a week.
Get your own New Year's Resolutions:



Hmm. Spending less time on greek shouldn't be too bad, but if I am resolving to give up Winchesters then I can tell already that this is one of those "better in theory than in practice" sort of ideas. Like eating less chocolate. Or getting up in the morning.

The eating books one pings me, though, because that actually is something that I want t do more of. I've always thought of the reading that I did as a little girl as being like eating; I was driven by a need for text in the same way that I was driven by a need for nourishment. The text was my nourishment. I don't read like that anymore, or not as much. Reading that's purely for pleasure, nothing academic or highbrow in my intentions, consuming like fire and light. The sort of reading where you skip meals and maybe even classes, where you forget how to speak. Like that.

I've been thinking a lot of about the place of pleausre, of the id, in my own reading and writing. I think that half the reason I worte such funny stilted things three or four years ago was that I felt afraid of my id, that it seemed like smething sub-literary that I ought to suppress. But I've been questioning why I feel that way. Why shouldn't the soul-deep satisfaction of Anne and Gilbert's first kiss be all right, worthwhile, acceptable? I wonder if it doesn't tie in somehow to the ghettoization of women's writing, feeling subordinated to the phallus-shaped plot. But maybe that's going too far.

At any rate, I've been trying to let my id out a bit more. Fandom has always been a place for that, but in my own writing and reading and living. I don't see what I should be so ashamed of. I like stories that make me feel warm and squishy, especially via angst or hurt/comfort. That doesn't necessarily mean that nothing that makes me feel that way has no other value besides emotional masturbation.

And while I'm on the subject, what's so wrong about masturbation?

I'm very ready to go back to school. There's no snow, and everything's so very grey. At least at school I have work, have text, have thought-food.

Date: 2006-12-31 07:39 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] slashfairy.livejournal.com
There's an idea that "No-one does evil consciously. Intentionally, but not consciously." The point being that if one were truly conscious ["awake to one's conscience, to one's "knowing with" (see both conscience and skei- (http://www.bartleby.com/61/roots/IE464.html) in Bartleby's online, American Heritage Dictionary), thus, able to understand (stand under, stand in the light of) the true and total effects of one's actions] one would not do evil. Whereas intent... well. That's easy. "I want it, so it must be right, and I will justify it with [name anything]."

So. I tend to think not well or badly of people but with hope for persons, and as compassionately of 'people' (mass/group) as I can, by placing myself in the spot I've got the other in. Works sometimes.

This is turning out to be an interesting thread. You have an interesting friendslist!
(http://www.bartleby.com/61/86/C0578600.html)

Profile

lotesse: (Default)
throbbing light machine

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Page generated Feb. 2nd, 2026 03:52 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios