no subject
Sep. 29th, 2005 02:44 pmI'm having massive feminist anxiety again.
Actually, it's all sort of dogpiling me at the moment. I'm digging through writing a paper on "Cinderella," trying to do what Gilbert and Gubar did for "Snow White" in "the Madwoman in the Attic," trying to find some way of justifying my feeling that the story is not nearly as sexist as we think it is. This is turning up some really weird stuff about feet and girly bits, esp. with Bettelheim, who somehow comes up with the sister's mutilation of their feet as a symbolic castration, but moving on...
Twisty, who blogs at <http://twistyfaster.typepad.com>, has been talking about women's clothing and fashion. To her, all fashion is misogynistic. And I've felt really uncomfortable with my heels and lipstick.
Part of this is the uneasiness that I feel over the paper--am I excusing a reprehensible story? is it really a story of subjugation to the patriarchy? am I a bad feminist for writing this?--and part is just the old insecurity about "bad feminists."
I'm clinging to my "fashion as theater" concept, and it's sort of saving me. The idea is that clothing is costume, and you pick your part. Some mornings it's one thing, sometimes another. High feminine drag can be used ironically. Right? but is that really why I love it so much? The trouble is that, yes, I agree with the rhetoric that points out that no choice is made in a vacuum. I can't reconcile breast implants with feminism or feminist choice for that reason. But yet I'm saving up for a corset. How the hell does this work?
Awareness has to be the key. The corset attracts my inner antiquarian, my inner submissive. But when I wear it, I am no less than any other person. If men think that it's for them, I'll do my best to disabuse them of that notion. Female desire is a valid motive, and female sexual expression is necessary to the feminist cause.
And Cinderella is a self-motivated agent of femal sexual awakening, damn it!
Actually, it's all sort of dogpiling me at the moment. I'm digging through writing a paper on "Cinderella," trying to do what Gilbert and Gubar did for "Snow White" in "the Madwoman in the Attic," trying to find some way of justifying my feeling that the story is not nearly as sexist as we think it is. This is turning up some really weird stuff about feet and girly bits, esp. with Bettelheim, who somehow comes up with the sister's mutilation of their feet as a symbolic castration, but moving on...
Twisty, who blogs at <http://twistyfaster.typepad.com>, has been talking about women's clothing and fashion. To her, all fashion is misogynistic. And I've felt really uncomfortable with my heels and lipstick.
Part of this is the uneasiness that I feel over the paper--am I excusing a reprehensible story? is it really a story of subjugation to the patriarchy? am I a bad feminist for writing this?--and part is just the old insecurity about "bad feminists."
I'm clinging to my "fashion as theater" concept, and it's sort of saving me. The idea is that clothing is costume, and you pick your part. Some mornings it's one thing, sometimes another. High feminine drag can be used ironically. Right? but is that really why I love it so much? The trouble is that, yes, I agree with the rhetoric that points out that no choice is made in a vacuum. I can't reconcile breast implants with feminism or feminist choice for that reason. But yet I'm saving up for a corset. How the hell does this work?
Awareness has to be the key. The corset attracts my inner antiquarian, my inner submissive. But when I wear it, I am no less than any other person. If men think that it's for them, I'll do my best to disabuse them of that notion. Female desire is a valid motive, and female sexual expression is necessary to the feminist cause.
And Cinderella is a self-motivated agent of femal sexual awakening, damn it!
no subject
Date: 2005-09-29 08:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-09-29 09:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-09-30 12:06 am (UTC)Meanwhile, your attempts at deflection move me not. If you want a corset, high heels, lipstick, nose ring or a star-fairy tattoo then GET THEM and enjoy them.
no subject
Date: 2005-09-30 01:31 am (UTC)I wish I could take that hardcore a stance on this. It would prolly make my life much easier. But, then again, I'm taking up permanent residence in academia, so the odds of my being able to answer any question without lots of waffling are pretty low.
no subject
Date: 2005-09-29 09:20 pm (UTC)Ali speaking. I got this account when a friend asked me to, so I could read her friends-only entries.
no subject
Date: 2005-09-29 09:44 pm (UTC)I think too much, neh? But I'm papering on the subject, and it's being talked about a lot. Ack. Pain indeed.
no subject
Date: 2005-09-30 01:51 am (UTC)Also I saw a movie as a kid called "Three Nuts for Cinderella" where the branch that her father brings home has these three nuts, each of which turns into a set of clothes. I can't remember all of them but one is the dress for the ball with the slippers. The one *I* liked was a kick ass dark brown suede hunting outfit with a crossbow. She went hunting and caught the Prince's eye when she bagged a goose he missed.
I agree with singe that clothing can be power. It's only misogynistic if that's the way you relate to it. Why should women have to give up something they maybe like and is a personal expression because it's a man thing? That hunting outfit of Cinderellas is the perfect example, because it was an outfit that implied action and capability. It was even pretty Unisex. It was easy to move in. It was also just really cool.
no subject
Date: 2005-09-30 02:12 am (UTC)Any idea where I could find that movie? It sounds brilliant.
no subject
Date: 2005-09-30 03:37 am (UTC)Only in my memory, where it's been lodged since I was whatever age I was that Saturday when it was on. For some reason there was just this kids' TV movie on in the middle of the day, as I remember it. I looked it up on Imdb and it seemed like there was a movie of the same name that's got a big following in Germany--I may have seen the English dubbed version...
no subject
Date: 2005-09-30 03:43 am (UTC)Okay, I just looked at the comments on IMDB and it looks like the movie is, in fact, very well-known in other countries! It's shown every Christmas in a couple of countries! But it definitely seems to be the same movie--people say how the Prince has to accept Cinderella in all her roles (like hunter) and that the main character is a tomboy.