more extensive and unaffected pleasure

[lotesse]

Why, when discussing eighteenth-nineteenth(twentieth-)century anti-novel rhetoric, does no one address the discursive parallels with injunctions against onanism/masturbation? (and does anyone know of a book that does? because I would totally read that book.)

Comments

[oursin]

It's more about the covert representation of masturbation/masturbating characters in literary texts (an alternative title would be Beyond Uriah Heep: the self-abuser in Victorian Literature) than reading-as-wanking.

My review of this book was the one the journal editors went 'ooops - we lost it, please resend' about.