lotesse: (feminism - Buffy)
[personal profile] lotesse
I've been quiet on politics lately, mainly because Sarah Palin fills me with such BURNING, INTENSE RAGE that I find it difficult to see straight. But I wanted to link to this post at Jezebel on "Why Sarah Palin Incites Near-Violent Rage In Normally Reasonable Women":

Why does this particular pitbull in lipstick infuriate — and scare us — so viscerally? Why does her very existence make us feel — and act — so ugly? New York Times columnist Judith Warner calls Palin's nomination a "thoroughgoing humiliation for America’s women," because "Palin’s not intimidating, and makes it clear that she’s subordinate to a great man." Palin, who obviously is incredibly ambitious, masks that ambition behind her PTA placard and "folksy" talk. In the oft-replayed tape from earlier this summer, when asked about the Vice Presidency, Palin notoriously said, '“I’m used to bein’ very productive and workin’ real hard in an administration and we want to make sure that that ‘V.P.’ slot would be a fruitful type of position.”

...what Ms. Warner is dancing around, but not saying outright, is that for a certain kind of feminist, Palin is a symbol for everything we hoped was not true in the world anymore. We hoped that we didn't have to hide our ambition or pretend that our goals were effortlessly achieved ("I never really set out to be in public affairs, much less to run for this office," the Governor has said.) We hoped that we could be mothers without having our motherhood be our defining characteristic, as it seems to be for Palin. We hoped that we did not have to be perfect beauty queens to get to where we wanted to be in life, that our looks, good or bad, wouldn't matter.


The comment thread is also brilliant; I love outpourings of feminist anger. They feel so wonderfully cathartic.

Date: 2008-09-08 08:01 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bowtrunckle.livejournal.com
It drives me CRAZY that the media frequently includes Palin's "runner-up beauty queen" title in her list of accomplishments. What does that have to do with ANYTHING!? I don't hear the media discussing any other candidates' looks, good or otherwise. *is frustrated*

Date: 2008-09-08 11:14 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] amelia-petkova.livejournal.com
If you haven't already, you should read The Warrior Queens by Antionia Fraser. It talk about various aspects used to describe queens who led countries in war, such as pretending to be only a meek, weak woman; the woman as more of a man than her husband; the queen as the appendage of a male ruling relative; etc. Covers Boudicca through Margaret Thatcher.

Date: 2008-09-09 04:35 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] elderberrywine.livejournal.com
*surfaces from lurkerdom*

I must say I find this woman absolutely appalling. And what I resent most of all, oddly enough, is her co-option of the PTA title.

Lady, I was PTA president at my kid's school for the maximum allowable two years. And people like you are the worst kind. Self-righteousness and, you know it's true, a high school Mean Girl. Since a PTA president has to rely on her ability to con persuade people to work together, I really can't see you being much of an asset along these lines. *seethes*

No room for haters, lady. Just sayin'. *skulks back into the woodwork again*

Profile

lotesse: (Default)
throbbing light machine

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Page generated Jul. 17th, 2025 05:50 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios